February When we were in junior high school, my friend Rich and I made a map of the school lunch tables according to popularity. This was easy to do, because kids only ate lunch with others of about the same popularity. We graded them from A to E.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Although they are equipped with the knowledge of how unhealthy smoking can be, people still choose to smoke. It is a personal choice and a highly addictive habit.
Smokers choose to subject themselves to the health risks of smoking. It is not for the government or any third party to dictate whether or not a person should be allowed to smoke.
However, smoking does not only affect the smoker negatively. It also affects all the people around those who smoke because when people smoke in pubic the smoke travels everywhere through the air, and the negative effects of this smoke affects all living, breathing creatures.
Therefore smoking should be banned in all public places. People who smoke in public portray a bad example. Children are easily influenced in their growing stages. They imitate the people around them because they cannot differentiate between right and wrong.
Therefore they perceive the actions they see around them as the way things should be. Besides that, teenagers who see people smoke in public take it as precedent to start smoking as well.
Some teenagers think that smoking marks their transition into adulthood and maturity. Hence, more teenagers start smoking due to the influence of seeing other people smoke in public places. If smoking is banned in public areas, it will promote a healthier lifestyle for everyone.
People will see it as a government endorsement for a healthier lifestyle of everybody. This is because by banning smoking in public areas the government sends the message that the government cares about the health of the citizens and that the government discourages people from smoking.
Thus, when smoking is not allowed in public areas it reminds people that health care is very important. It reminds each and every person that the government is seriously concerned for the well being of its citizens. Therefore, people would be reminded to live a healthy lifestyle.
If smoking is banned in public places it safeguards the life of the smoker as well as that of the public. Studies have shown that second hand smoke kills. Second hand smoke causes sudden infant death syndrome SIDSrespiratory infections and asthma attacks in children.
Besides that, second hand smoke causes heart diseases and lung cancer in smoking and non-smoking adults. This means that just by being near people who are smoking, innocent people are dying of diseases that are caused by second hand smoke. Consequently, the health of innocent non-smokers who are in public places are being jeopardized against their will.
By disallowing people who smoke from smoking in public, it will cause smokers to smoke less. Because smoking is not allowed in public, people are only allowed to smoke in their homes. This would mean that as long as they are out of their homes: Smokers will have to wait until they get home to light up a cigarette.
As a result, their cigarette consumption reduces and they smoke less.
This in turn will benefit the smokers who have been trying to quit smoking but are unable to because they have more reason to stop. The law prohibits them from smoking in public areas, so cigarette consumption is reduced. Also, should they have an urge to smoke in public they will put in extra effort to quash the craving because it is punishable by law.
In addition, there is less temptation for smokers who want to quit smoking if the ban is enforced because no one will offer them cigarettes. Therefore, this allows them to abstain from smoking. In the long run it could help them quit, and also help them develop healthier lifestyles.
If smoking is not allowed in public areas it discourages non-smokers from starting to smoke at all. People will not be tempted to start smoking because they know that smoking is addictive, and if smoking is not allowed in public they will suffer from withdrawal from their addiction to the nicotine from cigarettes.
Surely one would not intentionally subject themselves to an addiction knowing that they will suffer withdrawal symptoms due to that addiction.Threats against Bush at public protests. A protester with a sign saying “Kill Bush” and advocating that the White House be bombed, at the March 18, anti-war rally in San Francisco.
Essays; Smoking in Public Places; Smoking in Public Places. 2 February Even though smokers want to quit, can’t because of the addiction to nicotine. Another argument I have against public smoking is health.
If you continue to consume obacco you will lose, a healthy heart, healthy lungs, healthy body, control, up to 15 years . Free Smoking papers, essays, and research papers.
Public Smoking Should Be Banned - Furthermore, it is one of the aggravating causes of respiratory and circulatory illnesses in children, such as asthma, bronchitis, and pulmonary infections.
In order to prepare an argumentative essay on smoking in public places, the writer must consider several factors: Voices for and against this position must be clearly presented. In addition, you must back legal arguments using the legal framework in existence in good detail.
Tags: argumentative essays, Smoking in Public Places essay. Top 10% Absolutely Positively the Best 30 Death Penalty Websites on the Internet (Top 1%) Death Penalty Information Center Probably the single most comprehensive and authoritative internet rersource on the death penalty, including hundreds of anti-death penalty articles, essays, and quotes on issues of deterrence, cost, execution of the innocent, racism, public opinion, women, juveniles.
Essay on Arguments For and Against a Smoking Ban. The banning of smoking in public places would benefit everybody and should be imposed everywhere because it would reduce the risk of health problems to non-smokers, reduce the number of smokers all together, and reduce the amount of valuable money tax payers spend on smoking .